Tuesday, January 23, 2007
I need to make a retraction, appologies to Barak Obama and of course Hillary Clinton!
Barak Obama Story Debunked
http://us.video.aol.com/video.index.adp?pmmsid=1824451
This story is out in a very timely manner. The worst of it is the Byzantine, or maybe Soviet method of trying to set a rift that would cause problems within the Democratic party. I think the people who started the whole thing at Insight Magazine need to be canned like the ones at Time who got canned for putting ME on the cover!
http://us.video.aol.com/video.index.adp?pmmsid=1824451
This story is out in a very timely manner. The worst of it is the Byzantine, or maybe Soviet method of trying to set a rift that would cause problems within the Democratic party. I think the people who started the whole thing at Insight Magazine need to be canned like the ones at Time who got canned for putting ME on the cover!
# posted by Katja R. @ 7:03 AM 
Comments:
<< Home
I think that the target wasn't really Senator Obama, I think the REAL target was Sen Hillary Clinton! I noted that she handled her denial of involvement in a totally forthright manner, that does credit to her.
You have to assume that Republicans will try to discredit Democrats and that Democrats will try to discredit Republicans.
In a campaign the first order of business is to discredit those in your own party as being less qualified. I still prefere Bill Richardson to either, but I would vote for Hillary Clinton. I used to have much more doubt about her but the way she handled the denial of involvement in this story impressed me very favorably.
I want to see more of what Obama would do, how well he'd handle himself in general.
He's a good potential Vice Presidential candidate as well as a Presidential candidate.
I'm glad some sort of correction to the other story came out rapidly.
The fact that he lived in a heavily Muslim country is actually a very strong qualification for the job at this point in time, because I believe most of the foreign policy mistakes the U.S. has made in the past have come from a total misunderstanding of the Muslim countries. It has needlessly made us enemies, and a lack of savy about the hard-core element in that community in dealings in both Afghanistan and Central Asia has cost the United States dearly.
Post a Comment
You have to assume that Republicans will try to discredit Democrats and that Democrats will try to discredit Republicans.
In a campaign the first order of business is to discredit those in your own party as being less qualified. I still prefere Bill Richardson to either, but I would vote for Hillary Clinton. I used to have much more doubt about her but the way she handled the denial of involvement in this story impressed me very favorably.
I want to see more of what Obama would do, how well he'd handle himself in general.
He's a good potential Vice Presidential candidate as well as a Presidential candidate.
I'm glad some sort of correction to the other story came out rapidly.
The fact that he lived in a heavily Muslim country is actually a very strong qualification for the job at this point in time, because I believe most of the foreign policy mistakes the U.S. has made in the past have come from a total misunderstanding of the Muslim countries. It has needlessly made us enemies, and a lack of savy about the hard-core element in that community in dealings in both Afghanistan and Central Asia has cost the United States dearly.
<< Home
